Review of Postoperative Care for Heart Transplant Recipients.

The early postoperative management strategies after heart transplantation include optimizing the function of the denervated heart, correcting the causes of hemodynamic instability, and initiating and maintaining immunosuppressive therapy, allograft rejection surveillance, and prophylaxis against infections caused by immunosuppression. The course of postoperative support is influenced by the quality of allograft myocardial protection prior to implantation and reperfusion, donor-recipient heart size matching, surgical technique of orthotopic heart transplantation, and patient factors (eg, preoperative condition, immunologic compatibility, postoperative vasomotor tone, severity and reversibility of pulmonary vascular hypertension, pulmonary function, mediastinal blood loss, and end-organ perfusion). This review provides an overview of the early postoperative care of recipients and includes a brief description of the surgical techniques for orthotopic heart transplantation.

Preoperative Evaluation and Care of Heart Transplant Candidates.

Heart transplantation is recommended for patients with advanced heart failure refractory to medical and device therapy, and who do not have absolute contraindications. When patients become eligible for heart transplantation, they undergo comprehensive evaluation and preparation to optimize their posttransplantation outcomes. This review provides an overview of the processes that are employed to enable the candidates to be transplant-ready when donor hearts are available.

ECMO in cardiogenic shock and bridge to heart transplant.

PURPOSE: The aim of this review is to discuss the role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in cardiogenic shock and its use to bridge patients to heart transplantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consideration of published literature reveals indications for ECMO in cardiogenic shock and tools for patient selection, adequate evidence of its efficacy, its advantages when compared with other temporary mechanical circulatory support devices and details of its use as a bridge to decision, bridge to recovery, bridge to bridge (durable ventricular assist device) and bridge to heart transplant. CONCLUSION: ECMO is invaluable in treating patients with medically refractory profound cardiogenic shock and allows for cardiac recovery or planning for permanent heart replacement treatments.

Chugging to silent machines: development of mechanical cardiac support.

The concept of a mechanical device to support failing hearts arose after the introduction of the heart lung bypass machine pioneered by Gibbon. The initial devices were the pulsatile paracorporeal and total artificial heart (TAH), driven by noisy chugging pneumatic pumps. Further development moved in three directions, namely short-term paracorporeal devices, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), and TAH. The paracorporeal pumps moved in the direction of electrically driven continuous-flow pumps as well as catheter-mounted intracardiac pumps for short-term use. The LVAD became the silent durable electric, implantable continuous-flow pumps. The TAH remains a pneumatically driven pulsatile device with limited application, but newer technology is moving toward electrically operated TAH. The most successful pumps are the durable implantable continuous-flow pumps now taken over by the 3rd-generation pumps for the bridge to transplant and long-term use with significantly improved survival and quality of life. But bleeding including gastrointestinal bleeding, strokes, and percutaneous driveline infections exist as troublesome issues. Available data supports less adverse hemocompatibility of HeartMate 3 LVAD. Eliminations of the driveline will significantly improve the freedom from infections. Restoring physiological pulsatility to continuous-flow pumps is in the pipeline. Development of appropriate right VAD, miniaturization, and pediatric devices is awaited. Poor cost-effectiveness from the cost of LVAD needs to be resolved before mechanical cardiac support becomes universally available as a substitute for heart transplantation.

Practical Considerations for Solid Organ Transplantation During the COVID-19 Global Outbreak: The Experience from Singapore.

The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has not only caused global social disruptions but has also put tremendous strain on healthcare systems worldwide. With all attention and significant effort diverted to containing and managing the COVID-19 outbreak (and understandably so), essential medical services such as transplant services are likely to be affected. Closure of transplant programs in an outbreak caused by a highly transmissible novel pathogen may be inevitable owing to patient safety. Yet program closure is not without harm; patients on the transplant waitlist may die before the program reopens. By adopting a tiered approach based on outbreak disease alert levels, and having hospital guidelines based on the best available evidence, life-saving transplants can still be safely performed. We performed a lung transplant and a liver transplant successfully during the COVID-19 era. We present our guidelines and experience on managing the transplant service as well as the selection and management of donors and recipients. We also discuss clinical dilemmas in the management COVID-19 in the posttransplant recipient.

Life Beyond Heart Failure-What Are the Long-Term Challenges, Supportive Care Needs, and Views Toward Supportive Care of Multiethnic Asian Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device and Their Caregivers?

CONTEXT: Challenges experienced by patients with the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and their caregivers during the early period after LVAD implantation are well documented. However, little is known about long-term challenges, supportive care needs, and views toward supportive care of Asian LVAD patients and caregivers. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore the experiences of multiethnic Asian LVAD patients and caregivers so as to identify their long-term challenges, supportive care needs, and views toward supportive care. METHODS: Semistructured interviews with LVAD patients and caregivers were conducted based on the grounded theory approach. Participants were purposively recruited from the inpatient and outpatient settings of the National Heart Center Singapore. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients and 11 caregivers participated. More than half of the participants were Chinese (patients 63%; caregivers 64%). Most patients (83%) were males, whereas most caregivers were females (91%). The median duration on support was 31 months and 46 months for patients and caregivers, respectively. The implantation of the LVAD was a significant milestone in their lives and caused long-term changes in multiple domains (physical, financial, social, psychoemotional, and spiritual). Experiencing permanent and recurrent losses over time was particularly challenging. Participants expressed the need for mutual support between patient and caregiver and connectedness with others and society at large. Participants desired holistic supportive care from their health care team. CONCLUSION: Asian LVAD patients and caregivers experienced long-term challenges and had unique supportive care needs. Our findings have implications on the design of future interventions and supportive care models.

ECMO and Short-term Support for Cardiogenic Shock in Heart Failure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to discuss the role of ECMO in the treatment of cardiogenic shock in heart failure. RECENT FINDINGS: Trials done previously have shown that IABP does not improve survival in cardiogenic shock compared to medical treatment, and that neither Impella 2.5 nor TandemHeart improves survival compared to IABP. The "IMPRESS in severe shock" trial compared Impella CP with IABP and found no difference in survival. A meta-analysis of cohort studies comparing ECMO with IABP showed 33% improved 30-day survival with ECMO (risk difference 33%; 95% CI 14-52%; p = 0.0008; NNT 3). ECMO is indicated in medically refractory cardiogenic shock. ECMO can be considered in cardiogenic shock patients with estimated mortality of more than 50%. ECMO is probably the MCS of choice in cardiogenic shock with; biventricular failure, respiratory failure, life-threatening arrhythmias and cardiac arrest.

Percutaneous Decommissioning of Left Ventricular Assist Device.

BACKGROUND: The left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has revolutionised our treatment of advanced stage heart failure, giving debilitated patients a new lease on life. A small proportion of these LVAD patients can be bridged-to-recovery. The identification of these patients and decision to wean, however, can be challenging. METHODS: The need to fully explant the device upon recovery has evolved to a minimalist approach aiming to avoid injury to the 'recovered' heart. A review of the evolution of explant strategies was performed to guide our decision to wean the LVAD in our early experience. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2014, two patients in our series of 69 LVAD implants (2.9%) were successfully weaned off their LVADs. The second patient had a minimal access implantation of his HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD, Medtronic Inc, Framingham, MA, USA). His clinical variables and minimalist weaning strategy are described. CONCLUSIONS: A case of LVAD decommissioning by thrombosis of the outflow graft, using percutaneous Amplatzer Vascular Plug II (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) without surgery is reported.

Novel use of low-dose thalidomide in refractory gastrointestinal bleeding in left ventricular assist device patients.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a complication reported in patients post left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation that is associated with high mortality rates. Thalidomide is an anti-angiogenic compound that may offer a potential option for management of refractory LVAD-related GIB. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review was conducted from January 2009 to October 2016 at a tertiary cardiology center. It included LVAD patients initiated on thalidomide for refractory GIB. RESULTS: All patients (n = 11) were started on thalidomide 50 mg nocte and there was resolution of GIB in all patients except one (90.9%) during initial thalidomide treatment.The median duration of thalidomide therapy was 98 days (interquartile range: 34-215). The dose of thalidomide was reduced for 2 patients due to adverse effects. Thalidomide therapy was discontinued in 6 patients due to cessation of GIB (n = 4) and adverse effects (n = 2). Reported adverse effects included LVAD thrombosis (n = 2), somnolence (n = 1), neuropathy (n = 1), constipation (n = 1), and transaminitis (n = 1).Recurrent GIB occurred in 4 patients (45.4%) post-discontinuation of thalidomide therapy, which led to the re-initiation of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Thalidomide appears to be a safe and effective option for management of refractory LVAD-related GIB. Monitoring for recurrent GIB should be performed closely following cessation of thalidomide therapy.

Novel Use of Thalidomide in Recurrent Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding is an important and common complication of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). One of the common causes of gastrointestinal bleeding is arteriovenous malformations. However, the source of bleeding is often hard to identify. Thalidomide is efficacious in treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in non-LVAD patients. We report our experience of the use of thalidomide in the treatment of GI bleeding in four patients with LVAD. METHOD AND RESULTS: Four patients who had recurrent GI bleeding from May 2009 to December 2014 were started on thalidomide. All of them responded to treatment and had no further gastrointestinal bleeding while on thalidomide. One patient developed constipation, requiring thalidomide to be stopped. Another patient developed symptomatic neuropathy, that resolved with reduction of dosage. CONCLUSION: Thalidomide appears safe and efficacious in LVAD patients with recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding.

Mechanical circulatory support and heart transplantation in the Asia Pacific region.

Globalization has resulted in epidemiologic transition in developing countries from infectious disease and nutritional deficiencies to non-communicable diseases. Epidemiologic data on heart failure (HF), particularly advanced HF therapy, in Asia are increasingly becoming available, although they remain sparse. Heart transplantation for advanced stage HF remains very low in Asia-approximately 0.075 heart transplants per 1 million population. North America, which comprises 7.5% of the world population, accounted for 55.8% of transplants recorded in the 2012 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Registry, whereas Asia, with 62.5% of the world population, accounted for 5.7% of transplants. There is also lack of reporting from heart transplant centers in Asia to the ISHLT Registry. Most transplant programs in Asia are in economically stable South East Asian countries, whereas in other parts of developing countries, the cost and health care infrastructures remain prohibitive for the development of these programs. Multi-cultural and racial factors, religious beliefs, and diverse traditions of many centuries have resulted in reluctance to organ donation. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is emerging as a viable alternative to transplantation, but despite technical capabilities, limitations in embracing MCS in Asia exist. Discrepant practices in the reimbursement of costly MCS therapy have led to differences in the availability of these devices to patients in the region. The HeartMate II (St. Jude Medical, Inc, St. Paul, MN) left ventricular assist device is currently the most widely used durable device in Asia, whereas the HeartWare HVAD (HeartWare, Inc, Framingham, MA) is used most often in Australia. By September 9, 2015, 341 HeartMate implants (293 as bridge to transplant and 48 as destination therapy) had been performed, of which 180 implants were in Japan. The overall 4-year survival is 88%. The longest duration of support is 6.5 years. By the end of 2015, 243 HeartWare HVADs had been implanted in Asia Pacific. There is a need for focused efforts at improving the reporting of data and intensifying health policy within the region to advocate organ transplantation. Individual governments need to take national responsibility to fulfill organ donation and transplantation needs of their populations. International collaboratives, coordinated by societies such as the ISHLT, will be essential in moving this field forward in Asia Pacific.

Contained Rupture in HeartMate II Outflow Graft Bend Relief Disconnection.

Thoratec recalled their HeartMate II ventricular assist device in March 2012 after some problems related to disconnection of the bend relief. Abrasion on the pump outflow graft caused by a disconnected bend relief is rare. We report the case of a 49-year-old man in whom a disconnected bend relief caused a puncture in the outflow graft, resulting in a contained hematoma, requiring outflow graft replacement.

"Burnt out" dilated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy causing acute LVAD thrombosis.

Case report illustrates obstruction encountered in a patient with end-stage dilated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) who underwent LVAD implantation. The morphology reversed in early postoperative period to HCM. Pump replacement required coring of the ventricular muscle. Dilated end-stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy can revert back to the original morphology on decompression.

Use of left ventricular assist device (HeartMate II): a Singapore experience.

Recent advances in medical and device therapies in heart failure have improved the survival of patients with heart failure. However, due to the limited availability of suitable heart donors, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have become an important tool as a bridge-to-heart transplantation for patients with refractory heart failure in Singapore. We report our experience with the HeartMate II (HMII) LVAD (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA, USA) as a bridge-to-heart transplant in our center from 2009 to 2012. This was a retrospective review of 23 consecutive patients who underwent HMII LVAD implantation in our center between May 2009 and December 2012. All patients were classified as Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) levels 1 to 3 and underwent LVAD implantation as a bridge-to-heart transplant. There were 17 male and 6 female patients. The mean age was 43.6 years old (range 14 to 64). The etiologies of heart failure included ischemic heart disease [8], idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy [11], viral myocarditis [2], and chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy [2]. Nine patients were INTERMACS level 1, 12 patients level 2, and two patients level 3. All patients successfully underwent HMII LVAD implantation. There was no mortality within the first 30 postoperative days. Postoperative complications included stroke with full neurological recovery (21.7%), mediastinal infection (21.7%), cardiac tamponade or mediastinal collection requiring reopening of the chest (39.1%), cardiac arrhythmia (13.0%), and pump thrombosis with pump replacement (4.3%). All patients were discharged from hospital after LVAD implantation. Three patients experienced driveline infections during outpatient follow-up. There were 19 readmissions due to the following conditions: sub-therapeutic anticoagulation (13.0%), gastrointestinal bleeding (13.0%), suspected pump thrombosis (13.0%), transient ischemic attack (8.7%), arrhythmia (8.7%), congestive cardiac failure due to severe aortic regurgitation (8.7%), right ventricular failure (4.3%), rhabdomyolysis (4.3%), and hematuria (4.3%). Post-LVAD implantation, 20 patients were functionally New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I, while 3 reported NYHA III symptoms. Three patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation. One patient was successfully explanted 11 months after LVAD implantation. There were two mortalities during the follow-up period. The average duration of LVAD support was 522 days (range 47 to 1316 days). The HeartMate II LVAD has proven to be effective in our Asian population. Driveline infection rate remains low even in the tropical hot, humid climate in Singapore. With more patients ending up on extended periods of LVAD support, increased emphasis in the detection and management of long-term complications of ventricular assist devices will be needed.

Heart transplantation in Singapore.

INTRODUCTION: The status of heart transplantation in Singapore is reviewed in this article. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The database of 40 consecutive heart transplantations from July 1990 through December 2007 is reviewed retrospectively. The data is compared with the 2008 registry data of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). RESULTS: The average age of recipients was 45.3 years. Ages ranged from 14 to 64 years. Ischaemic cardiomyopathy (52.5%) and dilated cardiomyopathy (42.5%) were the major indications. From 1990 to 1999, 50% of the donors sustained brain death from road traffic accident, 25% from cerebrovascular accident and 25% from falling from height, whereas the cause of brain death in the donors from 2000 to 2007 was 33%, 47% and 9.5%, respectively. The average donor age increased from 28.3 to 38.1 years. The significant morbidities in the recipients were hypertension, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy and renal dysfunction. Thirtytwo required treatment for hypertension. 67.5% developed CMV disease requiring treatment. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy was diagnosed in 10. Rising creatinine levels reaching over 2.5 mg/dL was seen in 7. Three required renal dialysis. Epstein-Barr virus related lympho proliferative disorder occurred in 2 patients. One patient developed adenocarcinoma of stomach. The 30-day mortality was 10% and half life was 10 years. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy and sepsis caused 41.7% of mortality each. 11.7% of the mortality was due to cerebrovascular accident. CONCLUSION: The status of heart transplantation in Singapore is comparable to the ISHLT registry data. Transplant provides excellent early survival of 80%; however, the expected half life is around 10 years after cardiac transplantation. The late mortality is mainly caused by cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and renal failure. More effort and research needs to be directed towards these issues to improve the long-term results.